Skip to main content
NEW: Cloud Hardening for 2027.
hero template

Define It Once. Enforce It on Every Cloud.

Native turns one security architecture, whether defined from intent or proven in one cloud, into coordinated provider-native controls across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI. It simulates impact before rollout and keeps every cloud aligned as it evolves.

Schedule a Demo

One Architecture, Not Four Programs.

Every cloud is its own security program, with its own control model and its own way of doing things, so a control that works in AWS does not carry over cleanly to Azure, Google Cloud, or OCI.

Native gives you two paths to alignment: define the architecture from intent and enforce it across all four clouds, or take what already works in one cloud and translate it into equivalent enforcement everywhere else.

Either way, you get one security architecture instead of four separate programs.

The Problem

Four Clouds. Four Playbooks. One Weakest Link.

Expertise in one cloud does not transfer cleanly to the next. The capabilities are rooted in the inner workings of each provider, and they rarely translate 1:1: an outcome enforced with an AWS SCP may require a GCP organization policy, VPC Service Controls, or a different control family altogether. Teams end up re-interpreting and re-testing every architectural requirement for every provider, and the cloud with the thinnest coverage quietly sets the real security baseline.

Multi cloud alignment dashboard

The Enforcement

Describe It Once. Native Speaks Every Cloud.

Express the architecture in plain language, or start with the controls that already work in one cloud, and Native translates that intent into the right technical enforcement for each provider. That may include, for example, SCPs and RCPs on AWS, Azure Policy and management group constructs on Azure, organization policies and VPC Service Controls on Google Cloud, and compartment and IAM policies on OCI. The list is not exhaustive; Native chooses the appropriate provider-native controls based on the outcome you want, so one architecture produces equivalent enforcement everywhere.

feature 2

Confidence

See the Blast Radius on Every Cloud First.

Native replays historical activity against the proposed architecture, per provider, so you know which identities and resources are affected and in what order before anything ships. After deployment, Native tracks each provider's changes and surfaces drift, so alignment holds even as the four clouds evolve on their own timelines.

feature 3
resource

Go Deeper: Architecture for Active Defense in the Cloud

This solution is one layer of a larger architecture. The ebook maps the whole thing: actors and zones, boundaries and baselines, and how perimeter, segmentation, and baseline controls compile into provider-native enforcement across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI.

Get the ebook

You May Also Be Interested In

Active Defense, Answered

Multi-cloud security alignment means running one security architecture across every cloud you use instead of a separate program per provider. You can start by defining the outcome you want and enforcing it across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI, or by taking controls that already work in one cloud and translating them into equivalent enforcement in the others.

The same rules apply wherever the workload sits: the same perimeter, the same segmentation, the same baselines.

The hard part is that each provider implements those outcomes through different control families, so most teams end up with inconsistent coverage and a weakest-link provider that defines the real baseline. Alignment closes that gap by separating what must be true from how each cloud enforces it.

Native separates security intent from technical enforcement. You define what must be true once, or point Native at the controls that already enforce it in one cloud, and Native translates that architecture into the right controls for each provider. Those controls may include, for example, SCPs and RCPs on AWS, Azure Policy and management group constructs on Azure, organization policies and VPC Service Controls on Google Cloud, and compartment and IAM policies on OCI. These are examples, not a comprehensive list. The point is that a single architecture can generate the provider-specific controls needed to enforce the same outcome everywhere.

Infrastructure as code helps with provisioning, and Native works alongside it. But you cannot install aligned, provider-level multi-cloud enforcement just by writing Terraform once. Each cloud exposes different enforcement models, so the Terraform required for AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI is still provider-specific and does not stay aligned automatically.

Terraform scanning is also different from architectural enforcement. Code scanning can flag resource-level issues in the code and apply only where that pipeline is used. Native helps enforce higher-level outcomes directly at the cloud control plane, so coverage does not depend on every change flowing through the same pipeline.

A multi-cloud CSPM finds and reports misconfigurations across providers one resource at a time, after they exist. Alignment works at the level of architecture, not findings: you declare the perimeter, segmentation, and baselines once, and Native maps those outcomes to the enforcement mechanisms each provider already supports. Where a CSPM gives you four dashboards of things to fix, alignment gives you one architecture that holds. Most teams run both: Native enforces the standard, the scanner catches anything that slips.

Turn Security Intent Into Enforced Architecture

Schedule a demoexplore the platform