Skip to main content
NEW: Cloud Hardening for 2027.
hero template

Agentic Guardrails & Controls: Enable AI for Engineering

Native defines what AI agents can reach and act on, compiles those boundaries into provider-native controls, and enforces them regardless of the permissions an agent inherits, across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI.

Schedule a Demo

Boundaries That Hold From the Outside.

Agents are non-deterministic by nature, so guardrails can't live inside them. The architecture has to define what they can and can't do, from the outside. Native sets those boundaries once and enforces them through your providers' own controls, no matter what permissions an agent picks up along the way.

The Problem

AI Agents Inherit More Than You Think.

An agent runs with the permissions of whatever called it, and those permissions sprawl fast. The model an app calls, the data it can reach, the services it can act on: these are architectural decisions, but they usually get made implicitly, role by role, until an agent can touch far more than anyone intended, and nothing outside the agent is enforcing a limit.

feature 1

The Enforcement

Define What AI Can Reach. Native Enforces It.

Set your own boundary or get a recommended boundary from Native: which data sources AI can use, which services it can call, how long its access lives. Native compiles it into provider-native controls so the boundary holds at the infrastructure layer, outside the agent, regardless of inherited permissions. AI service calls can't reach data or regions outside the limit you set.

feature 2

Confidence

Know What Changes Before You Constrain an Agent.

Native replays historical activity against the proposed boundaries, so you can see which workloads and identities an AI guardrail would affect before it ships. After deployment, Native tracks drift, so the boundary holds as agents, models, and your cloud evolve.

feature 3
resource

Go Deeper: Architecture for Active Defense in the Cloud

This solution is one layer of a larger architecture. The ebook maps the whole thing: actors and zones, boundaries and baselines, and how perimeter, segmentation, and baseline controls compile into provider-native enforcement across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI.

Get the ebook

You May Also Be Interested In

Active Defense, Answered

It means giving engineering teams a way to build with AI agents while keeping hard limits on what those agents can reach and act on. Every engineering team is now an AI team, and the model an app calls, the data it can touch, and the services it can invoke are architectural decisions, not application details. Enabling AI safely means setting those boundaries once, at the architecture layer, so teams move fast without an agent quietly gaining access no one signed off on.

Native enforces the boundary outside the agent, at the cloud control plane, through provider-native controls. You declare which data sources AI can use, which services it can call, and how long its access lives, and Native compiles that into the right primitives for each provider. Because enforcement lives in the architecture rather than in the agent's role, it holds even when the agent inherits broad permissions from whatever invoked it.

Agents are non-deterministic by design, so a rule you put inside the prompt or the application logic is a suggestion, not a guarantee. Anything that depends on the agent behaving can be talked around, jailbroken, or simply skipped under an unexpected input. The architecture has to define what an agent can and can't do from the outside, where the limit doesn't depend on the agent's cooperation. That's deterministic enforcement: guaranteed, not predicted.

Prompt and application guardrails shape what an AI system can accept, generate, or pass through at runtime. Native adds deterministic enforcement at the cloud architecture layer, using the provider’s own controls to decide what can reach the application in the first place.

That means prompts containing PII can be blocked before they are passed to the application, and agents can be prevented from calling services or reaching data outside their approved boundary. Prompt and application guardrails still matter, but architectural enforcement gives teams a control layer that holds regardless of inherited permissions, prompt behavior, or agent design.

Turn Security Intent Into Enforced Architecture

Schedule a demoexplore the platform