Skip to main content
NEW: Cloud Hardening for 2027.
hero template

Cloud Security Compliance Enforcement. No Remediation Scramble.

Native maps your compliance requirements to enforceable, provider-native controls, simulates the impact, and keeps you audit-ready across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI, with no remediation cycles.

Schedule a Demo

Stay Ready Without Starting Over Every Quarter

Most compliance programs prove control after the fact: scan, find gaps, remediate, repeat before each audit. Native flips it. Requirements compile into controls that are enforced continuously, so you don't drift out of your desired state and there's nothing to remediate at audit time.

The Problem

The Cloud Changes the Moment the Audit Ends

You pass the audit, then the cloud keeps changing: new accounts, new services, new permissions, and the providers ship updates of their own. By the next review, the evidence is stale and the remediation cycle starts over. Compliance built on scanning and fixing is always chasing a state it can't hold.

feature 1

The Enforcement

Turn Requirements Into Controls the Cloud Enforces

Express the requirement in plain language and Native compiles it into the provider-native controls that satisfy it, mapped to the framework, on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI. The control is enforced, not just documented, so the requirement holds continuously instead of being proven once a year.

feature 2

Confidence

Preview the Impact, Then Keep the Control in Place

Native replays historical activity against the proposed controls, so you know what they'd affect before rollout. After deployment, Native tracks provider changes and surfaces drift the moment enforcement slips, so you stay in your compliant state between audits, not just during them.

feature 3
resource

Go Deeper: Architecture for Active Defense in the Cloud

This solution is one layer of a larger architecture. The ebook maps the whole thing: actors and zones, boundaries and baselines, and how perimeter, segmentation, and baseline controls compile into provider-native enforcement across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI.

Get the ebook

You May Also Be Interested In

Active Defense, Answered

Continuous compliance enforcement means the controls that satisfy your requirements are enforced all the time, not checked once before an audit. Instead of scanning for gaps and remediating them on a cycle, you map each requirement to a provider-native control that's actually enforced, so the cloud can't drift out of the compliant state in the first place. The result is audit-readiness as a steady state rather than a quarterly scramble.

Native compiles each requirement into the provider-native controls that satisfy it and enforces them at the cloud control plane, mapped back to the framework. Because the control is enforced rather than documented, the cloud stays in its compliant state by default. When a provider change or a new resource threatens to break alignment, Native surfaces the drift immediately, so you correct course continuously instead of remediating in bulk before an audit.

Reporting tools tell you where you're out of compliance, one finding at a time, and leave the fixing to you. Native enforces the control so the gap doesn't open: the requirement compiles into provider-native primitives that hold continuously. Where a CSPM produces a list to remediate, enforcement keeps you in state. Most teams run both: Native enforces, the reporting tool gives independent evidence.

Yes. You define requirements once and Native maps them to the right controls per provider, across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OCI, and a single requirement can satisfy more than one framework. Because intent is separated from implementation, adding a framework or a provider extends the existing mapping rather than starting a new program, and everything stays enforced under one architecture.

Turn Security Intent Into Enforced Architecture

Schedule a demoexplore the platform